Dataset ExplorerReligiousFounded 1935

Kingston Clan

76%
High-ControlGroup Dynamics Score
10/10Young's · Super Culty
5.9/10Lifton · Moderate Totalism
↓ DecliningTrajectory
2,000Membership / reach · 2019
Assessment Summary

The available record describes the Kingston Clan/Latter Day Church of Christ as a hereditary religious and economic community organized around obedience, plural or celestial marriage, family lineage, cooperative businesses, and salvation through unity. Investigative reports and former-member accounts document controlled marriages, restricted outsider relationships, internal economic dependence, secrecy, and substantial consequences associated with departure. Civil lawsuits allege trafficking, child labor, unpaid wages, abuse, and underage marriage; those allegations should remain distinguished from adjudicated facts. Separate criminal cases resulted in fraud-related guilty pleas and prison sentences for particular Kingston-associated business figures, without by themselves proving an official church policy. Evidence is comparatively thin for orchestrated mystical experiences and institutionalized confession, while doctrine-over-person dynamics are documented principally through reported subordination of marriage, reproductive experience, external relationships, and personal objections to hierarchy and bloodline theology.

Ten Criteria
C1Charismatic Leadership
High
8.7/10

The Kingston Clan, more formally the Latter Day Church of Christ and organizationally associated with the Davis County Cooperative Society, has a centralized, hereditary leadership structure. Charles Elden Kingston founded the group in 1935, leadership subsequently passed within the Kingston family, and contemporary reporting identifies Paul Elden Kingston as the current leader.[1][2][3] A historical overview says Elden became the group’s first prophet and established the Davis County Cooperative Society, while Charles W. Kingston, Elden’s father, served as patriarch and supported successive leaders until his death in 1975. Sources describe leaders as exercising extensive authority over marriages, internal economics, and community rules.[2][7][13] Mormonism Research Ministry reproduces an organizational teaching that each person, regardless of authority or station, is responsible to the person above him as though that superior “was the Savior himself,” evidence that the hierarchy is given religious significance. The SPLC reports that Elden predicted he would be resurrected after death and that members kept his body on ice for three days, indicating that at least one early leader was credited with extraordinary prophetic authority. Contemporary coverage more often emphasizes secrecy, obedience, coercive hierarchy, and family succession than public, personality-driven inspirational rhetoric.[1][7][14] The documented organizational pattern is therefore one of concentrated and sacralized dynastic authority; the available public sources provide less direct evidence about members’ emotional devotion to Paul Kingston personally or about charisma in the narrow Weberian sense.

C2Sacred Assumptions
High
8.7/10

Descriptions of the Kingston Clan identify beliefs treated as foundational truths governing identity, marriage, bloodline, authority, and salvation. Sources repeatedly connect the group’s theology to plural marriage, “celestial marriage,” and the proposition that obedience to the group’s structure is necessary for heaven.[1][2] A reference profile specifically identifies obedience to a hierarchical structure, unity as necessary to gain heaven, and a distinctive interpretation of polygamy among the group’s principles. The SPLC reports that Kingston teaching links incestuous intermarriage to “keeping the bloodline pure,” framing biological descent and marriage choice as spiritually significant rather than merely social.[13] Mormonism Research Ministry reports a related belief that Kingston family members possess superior genetics because their lines originate with Jesus, who is said in that account to have married and produced descendants. Reporting also says the community is treated as a religiously governed system in which internal norms override outside moral standards, and that women’s reproductive outcomes can be moralized as sin.[4][15] Under these reported teachings, family hierarchy, blood purity, and arranged marriages are not presented as negotiable preferences but as sacred realities.[1][13][15] The available sources do not supply a comprehensive official creed or current doctrinal manual, and some accounts come from former members or organizations critical of the group. Nevertheless, multiple sources independently describe beliefs about purity, authority, unity, salvation, and plural marriage as premises that structure members’ family and communal lives.[1][4][13]

C3Transcendent Mission
High
8/10

Sources describe the Kingston Clan’s organizational purpose in explicitly transcendent terms. Unity, obedience, and plural marriage are reportedly taught as spiritually necessary to gain heaven, providing an otherworldly purpose for compliance with the community’s structure.[1] Arranged plural marriages, strict lineage management, and family control are portrayed as religious necessities rather than solely secular customs.[1][2][13] Historical commentary says the Kingstons claim that Elden Kingston received a new “dispensation,” a term referring to a divinely authorized period or transmission of truth and priesthood authority. The language reported by journalists and research summaries places daily life within a salvific framework: conformity is connected to eternal reward, and family continuity is tied to divine order.[1][4] The group’s extensive revenue-generating business network is also described as part of a combined religious and economic community rather than an ordinary collection of unrelated private businesses.[7][8][14] Accounts of the cooperative or “United Order” model connect economic sacrifice and consecration to religious purposes, although the available sources do not provide a single current, official mission statement. Taken together, the reported purpose is salvation and preservation of a divinely ordered community through obedience, unity, plural marriage, reproductive continuity, and maintenance of the Kingston lineage.[1][13][14] The evidence does not establish that every member articulates the mission identically, but it documents a framework in which marriage, work, family organization, and institutional loyalty serve goals understood as extending beyond members’ temporal lives.

C4Identity Sublimation
High
7.7/10

Reporting says Kingston members are expected to obey a hierarchical structure and prioritize unity over personal autonomy, while former members describe control over relationships, marriage, work, and daily conduct.[1][2][7] Arranged plural marriages, including marriages reported between close relatives, restrict personal choice in intimate life and embed individual identity within family and organizational obligations.[2][15] Accounts also describe a secretive internal economy and a community culture in which members are taught to be polite to outsiders but not to form ordinary outside friendships.[7][8][11] Reported use of internal “scrip” reinforces reliance on institutional economic structures rather than independent access to mainstream currency and employment.[6] Historical material adds that Kingston followers in the 1940s and 1950s wore distinctive outer garments that led outsiders to call them “blue-coats”; men and boys reportedly wore the prescribed garments as part of a recognizable collective appearance. These practices document several mechanisms by which personal preference may be subordinated to communal identity: leaders’ role in marriage selection, dense kinship obligations, prescribed social boundaries, distinctive dress during an earlier period, and economic dependence on cooperative businesses. The available record relies substantially on survivor testimony and investigative reporting rather than systematic observation of all current members, so it does not establish uniform compliance in every household. It does, however, document institutional expectations and arrangements that place marriage, association, economic activity, and family identity under collective and hierarchical direction.[1][2][6][7][15]

C5Information Isolation
High
7/10

The Kingston Clan is described as highly secretive and as maintaining a pronounced boundary between members and outsiders.[4][6][7][10] CBS and other reporting say members are taught not to make friends outside the group, while VICE describes deprivation of ordinary access to the rest of society.[2][7] Rolling Stone reports that children begin being trained at approximately age three in what to say when outsiders question them, indicating early management of external communication. A former member quoted by CBS said members were not allowed to interact freely with the outside world because leaders were afraid outsiders would take members away. Internal currency and concentration of employment in Kingston-associated businesses can create practical insulation by reducing members’ reliance on outside institutions.[6][8] The group is not geographically confined to one fully closed compound: CBS describes an estimated 7,500 members in Utah’s Salt Lake Valley and in Colorado and California. Members also encounter broader society through schools, work, commerce, and legal systems. The documented pattern is therefore primarily social, informational, familial, and economic insulation rather than complete physical seclusion. Historical commentary describes decades of extreme secrecy alongside an extensive cooperative system holding wealth through at least 50 corporations in Utah and elsewhere. These arrangements allow external commercial activity while maintaining internal dependence and controlled disclosure. Sources consequently document a community that can participate in mainstream markets and institutions while discouraging close outsider relationships and managing what members reveal.[2][6][7][8]

C6Private Vernacular
High
5/10

Sources identify several recurring insider or organization-specific terms: “The Order,” “Kingston Clan,” “Kingston Group,” “United Order,” Latter Day Church of Christ, and Davis County Cooperative Society.[1][3][5][7][10] These names distinguish the religious body, family network, and cooperative economic organization, although reporting does not always use them consistently. “The Order” functions as the principal in-group designation in numerous former-member accounts and news reports, while “Kingston Clan” is more common in outside coverage. Reporting also identifies “scrip” as an internal currency reportedly used by members in place of or alongside U.S. dollars.[6] The associated economic terminology includes “the Co-op” or Davis County Cooperative Society, linking religious membership with the organization’s business system. The term “celestial marriage” places plural marriage within a specialized theological framework, and historical accounts describe the “United Order” and the law of consecration as religious concepts governing sacrifice and communal economics. These terms can encode practices in language whose fuller meaning depends on familiarity with the group’s theology and organization. The available sources do not document a comprehensive glossary, a unique private language, or a dense system of thought-terminating phrases. Nor does the existence of multiple organizational names by itself establish that outsiders cannot understand group communications. The record nevertheless documents repeated use of distinctive labels for the community, its hierarchy, marriage system, cooperative economy, and internal means of exchange.[1][3][5][6][7][10]

C7Us-vs-Them Dynamics
High
7.3/10

Multiple sources describe members as being taught to maintain social separation from outsiders. Former members report that the group encourages outward politeness while discouraging genuine external friendships.[7][11] A former member interviewed by CBS said members were not permitted to interact freely with the outside world because leaders feared outsiders would take them away. Rolling Stone similarly reports that children are trained from an early age in what to say if questioned by people outside the group. Such practices distinguish trusted insiders from outsiders perceived as potential threats to membership continuity. SPLC reporting says Kingston theology and culture have included hostility toward non-white people, homophobia, and disdain for government authority, creating additional moral and social boundaries.[13] SPLC also reports former-member accounts involving a doctrine of “pure Kingston blood,” under which Kingston ancestry is treated as specially valuable and intermarriage with relatives is used to preserve the lineage. News accounts describe the organization as secretive and frequently in conflict with public authorities over allegations of abuse, fraud, labor violations, and unlawful marriages.[1][2][14][15] Legal scrutiny does not itself prove an oppositional doctrine, but secrecy, warnings about outsiders, controlled external communication, bloodline teachings, and reported hostility toward government collectively document an insider/outsider division. The evidence does not establish that every current member endorses every racial, sexual, or political attitude attributed to the organization, and several claims derive from former-member testimony. It does document organizational practices that restrict external relationships and characterize outside society as a danger to member loyalty.[7][11][13]

C8Labor Exploitation
High
8/10

The Salt Lake Tribune reported in 2024 that ten women filed a federal racketeering lawsuit alleging that the Kingston sect trafficked women and children “for decades” and violated federal labor laws.[14] Earlier coverage described a 109-page complaint filed by former members alleging sexual abuse and unpaid wages. Courthouse News reported claims of child labor and forced-labor-like arrangements tied to abusive marriages and coercive family structures.[15] The Guardian summarized the litigation as alleging unpaid labor, sexual abuse, human trafficking, indoctrination, rape, and child marriage. These remain plaintiffs’ allegations unless and until established through adjudication, settlement, or admitted facts. CBS and other coverage describe the Kingston community as controlling an extensive business network or business empire, a relevant structural fact because employment, housing, religion, and family relationships may be concentrated within the same organization.[7][8] Reported use of internal scrip instead of ordinary wages or currency can deepen members’ dependence on the cooperative economy.[6] Historical accounts describe at least 50 corporations in Utah and elsewhere associated with the cooperative system. Former members allege that women and children were assigned or expected to perform work for family or Kingston-associated businesses without lawful compensation. The record therefore includes detailed civil allegations of unpaid labor, child labor, trafficking, and labor-law violations, supported by survivor accounts and investigative reporting, but it should not conflate those allegations with final findings against every named defendant or every Kingston-affiliated business.[6][7][14][15]

C9Exit Costs
High
8.3/10

Former-member accounts and investigative reporting describe departure as involving potential loss of family relationships, social standing, housing, employment, economic support, and contact with children.[2][7][14][15] Because plural marriages, employment, religious participation, and kinship are densely concentrated within the same network, departure can sever several support systems simultaneously.[2][13][15] Reporting on arranged marriages and extensive interrelatedness indicates that many close relatives may remain inside the organization when one member leaves. Dependence on Kingston-associated businesses and internal scrip may also leave former members without independent savings, conventional work histories, or outside professional networks.[6][7] VICE profiled Joe Robinson as a young man struggling after his excommunication from the Kingston Clan, illustrating social and practical disruption following involuntary exit. Rolling Stone described Stephen, who no longer believed in the Order but understood that exposing abuse would place him in conflict with people he loved. CBS reported that whistleblowers Mary and Bryan remained worried about retaliation after assisting authorities in an alleged tax-fraud investigation. The 2024 litigation coverage alleging trafficking and abuse describes additional barriers involving fear, legal complexity, and trauma.[14][15] These accounts show that leaving is not equivalent to changing an ordinary congregational affiliation: it can entail separation from an integrated kinship, marriage, labor, housing, and religious system. The evidence is principally survivor testimony and press reporting rather than a statistical study of all departures, so the frequency and outcome of each consequence cannot be quantified from the available sources.

C10Ends Justify Means
High
7/10

Civil complaints and investigative reports allege that coercive or unlawful conduct—including trafficking, child labor, forced or underage marriages, and abuse—was used in maintaining the Kingston religious, familial, and economic system.[14][15] These claims must be distinguished from adjudicated criminal conduct. KSL reports that Washakie Renewable Energy CEO Jacob Kingston and other participants pleaded guilty to offenses including mail fraud, filing false claims, money laundering, destroying records, and witness tampering in a large renewable-fuel tax-credit scheme. Subsequent KSL coverage says Kingston family members were sentenced to federal prison in 2023 and that associated companies fraudulently obtained and resold Environmental Protection Agency renewable identification numbers, generating approximately $65 million. CBS reported a government allegation that the brothers hired an enforcer to intimidate and harm potential witnesses. Those criminal proceedings concern particular individuals and businesses and do not by themselves establish an official church doctrine authorizing fraud. SPLC reporting separately describes teachings in which incestuous marriage and racial or bloodline purity are framed as serving preservation of the lineage.[13] The organization’s secrecy, discipline, and integrated business network provide context for allegations that individual welfare or outside legal norms were subordinated to institutional continuity.[1][7][8] The Kingston Group has denied that “bleeding the beast”—defrauding outside government systems—was ever one of its tenets, calling the concept abhorrent and stating that its values emphasize self-sufficiency. Thus, the record contains both adjudicated fraud by specific Kingston-associated actors and disputed allegations that harmful conduct served broader organizational purposes.[13][14][15]

Psychological Totalism · Lifton
Moderate Totalism
5.9/10

Computed from criterion evidence across Lifton's eight themes of thought reform (breadth × intensity) — not a direct jury score.

C11Mystical Manipulation
3/10

The available material contains evidence of extraordinary prophetic claims but little documentation of deliberately orchestrated peak experiences, staged signs, ecstatic rituals, or manufactured coincidences of the kind specified by this criterion. The clearest reported episode concerns founder Charles Elden Kingston. The SPLC says Elden predicted that he would be resurrected after death and that members kept his body on ice for three days in anticipation; the predicted resurrection did not occur. This documents members acting on a leader’s supernatural claim and attributing exceptional prophetic authority to him, but the source does not establish that the event was staged by leaders as a manufactured sign or that the failed prediction was subsequently reframed as proof of authority. Historical commentary also reports the Kingston claim that Elden received a new religious “dispensation,” placing his authority within a framework of special revelation. Reporting on Paul Kingston describes patriarchal and doctrinal authority, plural marriages, business oversight, and obedience, but the cited material does not identify controlled revival meetings, induced trance states, staged healings, ecstatic ceremonies, or coincidences deliberately arranged and presented as divine intervention. The evidence therefore establishes supernatural claims surrounding early leadership and a belief in special revelation. It does not presently establish the operational component central to Lifton’s mystical manipulation—leadership’s conscious orchestration of awe-producing experiences or events and presentation of those events as confirmation of the organization’s unique authority.

C12Cult of Confession
2/10

The reviewed sources document secrecy, hierarchical correction, fear of reprisals, and controlled communication, but they do not provide a specific, verifiable account of an institutionalized confession system. CBS identifies the organization as a secretive Mormon splinter group founded in the 1930s and reports extensive leader control, but the cited material does not describe recurring confession interviews, public self-criticism sessions, shaming circles, required disclosure of sexual or ideological transgressions, or records of admissions retained for later leverage. An anonymous former employee interviewed about a Kingston-associated business requested anonymity because of fear of reprisals, and former Order members quoted elsewhere similarly requested pseudonyms. Those facts demonstrate perceived retaliation risk, not a cult of confession by themselves. Reports that members are trained in what to tell outsiders show information management directed outward; they do not establish compelled self-disclosure inward. Likewise, evidence that marriages, work, and conduct are supervised does not prove that members must confess thoughts or misconduct to leaders. No available source explains who would receive confessions, how frequently they would occur, whether disclosures would be public or private, what sanctions would follow, or whether leaders retained and weaponized the information. The public record reviewed here consequently supports only adjacent conditions—a secretive hierarchy capable of correction and retaliation—while leaving the defining practices in the research guidance unverified. This is an evidentiary gap, not evidence that confession practices do not occur.

C13Doctrine Over Person
7.3/10

Reported Kingston teachings and practices contain examples in which personal preference or experience is expected to yield to doctrine and hierarchy. Sources describe obedience to the organizational structure and unity as necessary to gain heaven, making disagreement with leaders a religious rather than merely administrative issue. Mormonism Research Ministry reproduces a teaching that every individual is responsible to the person above him as though that superior were “the Savior himself.” Former-member and litigation accounts describe arranged plural marriages, including alleged underage and close-relative marriages, in which individual objections were subordinated to teachings about celestial marriage, family authority, and preservation of “pure Kingston blood.”[1][2][13][15] Reporting also says women’s reproductive outcomes could be interpreted morally as sin,[4][15] illustrating a framework in which personal bodily experience is assigned a doctrinal explanation. Accounts of children being trained in what to say to outsiders and discouraged from forming outside friendships show that perceptions acquired through external contact may be filtered through institutional warnings about outside society.[2][7] Survivor allegations further describe punishment, family pressure, economic dependence, or loss of relationships following refusal of marriages or departure.[7][14][15] These facts document repeated subordination of personal relationship choices, outside observations, and reproductive experience to religious claims about obedience, salvation, and lineage. The reviewed sources do not provide transcripts of formal doctrinal debates or a standardized procedure for correcting doubt, so the precise language leaders use to reframe challenges remains incompletely documented.

Methodology & Provenance

Scored under V4.0 of the Organizational Coercion Index dual-metric system. Last revised July 2026. All scores are anchored to publicly documented, verifiable behaviors. Framework criteria derived from Young & Reed, The Culting of America (Otterpine, 2026). Full methodology →

Cite this assessmentOrganizational Coercion Index. “Kingston Clan.” Organizational Coercion Index Dataset,V4.0 (July 2026). organizationalcoercionindex.org/org/kingston-clan. Applying Young & Reed, The Culting of America (Otterpine, 2026).

© 2026 Organizational Coercion Index. Permitted uses: academic citation, journalism, personal research with attribution. Terms of Use →

Political Compass
Political position not yet scored
Criteria Profile
C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10
C18.7
C28.7
C38
C47.7
C57
C65
C77.3
C88
C98.3
C107