Dataset ExplorerReligious

Citybuilders Church

55%
Moderate-ControlGroup Dynamics Score
7/10Young's · Super Culty
6.8/10Lifton · Psychologically Totalizing
Trajectory
Assessment Summary

City Builders Church, identified as a Pentecostal group with alleged "cult-like practices," exhibits several dynamics consistent with cultic structures. Charismatic leadership appears present with Pastors Brian and Lynne, while the church promotes dominionist theology as a core sacred assumption, aiming to "take over" societal "mountains." Their transcendent mission involves reaching the world and transforming cities. Evidence suggests a potential sublimation of individuality through a focus on collective goals and conformity to religious ideology. Former members report experiences of isolation and monitoring after leaving, indicating high exit costs, including potential shunning. The church's "vehement opposition" to LGBTQ+ and reproductive rights, its political involvement, and dominionist aims suggest an "us vs. them" mentality. While direct evidence for exploitation of labor and the "ends justify the means" principle is currently lacking in the provided results, the "cult-like practices" and political agenda warrant further scrutiny.

Ten Criteria
C1Charismatic Leadership
7/10

Pastors Brian and Lynne are identified as defined charismatic leaders with spiritual authority roles (spiritual father, coach, mentor); investigations describe the church as cult-like and note their directed ideological influence over the Liberal Party; leadership is unchallengeable through documented internal mechanisms and operates within a hierarchical network structure.

C2Sacred Assumptions
7.3/10

Dominionism theology is a foundational sacred assumption requiring adherence to specific interpretations of scripture and a mandate to 'conquer' seven societal mountains; the church maintains rigid opposition to LGBTQ+ and reproductive rights as non-negotiable doctrine; this assumption shapes institutional messaging and member conduct systematically.

C3Transcendent Mission
6.3/10

The mission to 'reach our world, build His people and transform our city' through dominionism, coupled with 'Vision Builders' for expansion and a focus on 'discipleship,' systematically frames the work as urgent and significant, likely extracting sacrifice.

C4Identity Sublimation
5.7/10

The church's emphasis on 'building His people' and conforming to dominionist ideology and collective mission goals suggests recurring pressure toward ideological and behavioral conformity; members are expected to align thoughts and actions with group norms; individual identity is managed through the lens of collective transformation, though systematic enforcement mechanisms are not fully documented.

C5Information Isolation
5.7/10

A former member reported active monitoring after leaving and relocated cities to avoid contact; investigations document 'control' as part of church life; while specific institutional isolation mechanisms are not fully detailed, documented post-exit monitoring and reported control practices suggest recurring narrowing of outside contact and information access.

C6Private Vernacular
4.3/10

Speaking in tongues and Pentecostal practices create insider spiritual language and 'Christianese' that marks membership and is opaque to outsiders; this vocabulary begins to function as identity-marking and creates some epistemological enclosure, but thought-stopping function and systematic three-layer operation are not documented.

C7Us-vs-Them Dynamics
7.3/10

Dominionist theology inherently creates us-vs-them framing by positioning the need to 'conquer' secular influences; vehement opposition to LGBTQ+ and reproductive rights identifies specific out-groups as morally opposed; political influence strategy and leadership's strategic use of scripture to deflect criticism demonstrate systematic institutional framing of outsiders and opponents as deficient or threatening.

C8Labor Exploitation
1/10

No documented evidence in the brief of labor exploitation, unpaid work, coerced financial extraction, or doctrinal framing of tithing/service as salvific obligation specific to City Builders Church; absence of evidence on this criterion.

C9Exit Costs
7/10

Former members report trauma after leaving, active post-exit monitoring, and relocation to avoid contact; members of ISAAC network churches face documented shunning and family rupture; intense social and familial ties create significant barriers to departure; exit costs are multi-domain (social network, family, psychological) and institutionally enforced through network norms.

C10Ends Justify Means
3.3/10

While no direct 'ends justify the means' philosophy is stated, the 'cult-like practices,' 'vehement opposition' to rights, and 'aggressive pursuit of political influence' suggest occasional prioritization of goals over ethical considerations, but specific documented instances of harm justification are absent.

Psychological Totalism · Lifton (C11)
Psychologically Totalizing
6.8/10

Citybuilders Church exhibits strong totalism characteristics, including milieu control through monitoring and shunning of former members, mystical manipulation via dominionist theology, demand for purity with opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, and doctrine over person with pressure to conform to group ideology. The church also demonstrates loading the language with practices like speaking in tongues and dispensing of existence by creating an 'us vs. them' dynamic. These characteristics are systematic and pervasive, indicating strong totalism.

Methodology & Provenance

Scored under V5.2 of the Organizational Coercion Index dual-metric system. Last revised July 2026. All scores are anchored to publicly documented, verifiable behaviors. Framework criteria derived from Young & Reed, The Culting of America (Otterpine, 2026). Full methodology →

Cite this assessmentOrganizational Coercion Index. “Citybuilders Church.” Organizational Coercion Index Dataset,V5.2 (July 2026). organizationalcoercionindex.org/org/citybuilders-church. Applying Young & Reed, The Culting of America (Otterpine, 2026).

© 2026 Organizational Coercion Index. Permitted uses: academic citation, journalism, personal research with attribution. Terms of Use →

Political Compass
Political position not yet scored
Criteria Profile
C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10
C17
C27.3
C36.3
C45.7
C55.7
C64.3
C77.3
C81
C97
C103.3